Tag Archives: Leading Report

Did Leaked Airbnb Email Reveal June 6 Lockdown Plan?!

Claim : Leaked Airbnb Email Reveal June 6 Lockdown Plan!

People are claiming or suggesting that a leaked Airbnb email revealed large-scale government plans to restrict travel and initiate a lockdown!

Ariel : A Quick Prep & Step

It is being reported that AirBnB is anticipatiing a large-scale government event that will bring about reinstated lockdowns to begin on June 6, 2024, this is coming from a email.

But ofcourse this is not news to any of you if you have been following this channel over the last few months.

As I have along with “The Judges” forewarned everyone that this will indeed happen. The good news is that just like the last lockdown I expect many to be rounded up and sent straight to Gitmo.

I do not know about any of you but my routine from the last lockdown didn’t change in the slightest. We all know that we are watching the last hand of cards being played from the Cabal.

Atleast we have a date now and can plan accordingly.

Patrick Webb / The General : BREAKING: AirBnB is expecting large-scale government actions and lockdowns to begin on June 6, 2024, according to a newly obtained email.

Shade Level 100.

Santa Surfing : Airbnb is prepping for “Major Disruptive Events” beginning June 6, 2024. 😳💥

Have you all check out Q markers for the first week of June?? They’re BIG! 🔥💥✨💫

JayJay : AIRBNB’S LEAKED EMAIL: LOCKDOWN’S LOOMING JUNE 6, 2024 – SUMMER OF LOVE? HOW WOULD AIRBNB KNOW THIS BEFORE THE FBI AND THE PUBLIC?

Airbnb has updated its Major Disruptive Events policy, anticipating large-scale government actions and lockdowns to begin on June 6, 2024.

This update has sparked a wide range of reactions among users, from curiosity and concern to humorous speculation and skepticism.

The reasons behind Airbnb’s anticipation remain unclear, but the policy change indicates a proactive approach to potential disruptions affecting their services globally.

Show less

Truth : Airbnb Email Did Not Reveal June 6 Lockdown Plan!

This appears to be another example of fake news circulating on social media, and here are the reasons why…

Fact #1 : Airbnb Email Did Not Reveal Any Lockdown Plan!

Let me start by quickly pointing out that the viral claims, and the viral screenshot of the leaked AirbnB email, do not reveal any government plan to restrict travel and initiate a lockdown!

The email itself only states that AirbnB was revising its Major Disruptive Events Policy from June 6, 2024 onwards. The email only mentions that the policy will now apply to foreseeable weather events too!

We’re updating our Extenuating Circumstances Policy and changing its name to make it easier to understand.

The revised Major Disruptive Events Policy will apply to all trips and Experiences taking place on or after June 6, 2024, regardless of when they were booked.

What’s changing in the policy?

Foreseeable weather events at the reservation’s location are explicitly eligible for coverage it they result in another covered event, such as a government travel restriction or large scale utility outage.

The policy will only apply to events in the place where the reservation is located. Events that impact a quest’s ability to travel to the reservation are no longer covered.

Your continued use of the Airbnb Platform from June 6, 2024 constitutes acceptance of the updated Major Disruptive Events Policy.

While the email mentioned “government travel restriction”, it was in reference to “weather events”. The email most definitely did not mention a lockdown.

Fact #2 : AirBnb Announced Update In March 2024

The Airbnb email was not “leaked” as claimed, but appears to have been sent to all AirBnb hosts, to alert them of this change. In fact, Airbnb publicly announced its policy update on 28 March 2024!

So, there is nothing secret about what was in the email, and the policy changes were already publicly revealed almost a month earlier!

Fact #3 : Policy Updates Do Not Include Lockdowns

If you read the March 28 Airbnb policy update announcement, you will see that it did not mention anything new about lockdowns.

Here is a summary of what Airbnb changed in its Major Disruptive Events Policy from 6 June 2024 onwards:

The policy will explicitly apply to foreseeable weather events, like a hurricane during hurricane season.
Coverage is limited to large-scale events at the destination location only.
Mid-trip cancellations for such events can be made with guests receiving a refund, without fees or related consequences for hosts.
Hosts are reminded that they’re obligated to cancel reservations if their hosting is uninhabitable, or no longer consistent with what was originally booked by their guests, and they can do so without cancellation fees and related consequences.

As you can see, none of the changes to Airbnb’s Major Disruptive Events Policy even suggest that there is a nefarious government plan to restrict travel, and initiate another lockdown!

Why on Earth would anyone make such a claim??? Unsurprisingly, none of them provided any evidence to back up their claims – the email they shared isn’t even proof of that!

Please help us FIGHT FAKE NEWS by sharing this fact check article out, and please SUPPORT our work!

Please Support My Work!

Support my work through a bank transfer / PayPal / credit card!

Name : Adrian Wong
Bank Transfer : CIMB 7064555917 (Swift Code : CIBBMYKL)
Credit Card / Paypal : https://paypal.me/techarp

Dr. Adrian Wong has been writing about tech and science since 1997, even publishing a book with Prentice Hall called Breaking Through The BIOS Barrier (ISBN 978-0131455368) while in medical school.

He continues to devote countless hours every day writing about tech, medicine and science, in his pursuit of facts in a post-truth world.

Recommended Reading

Go Back To > Fact Check | Travel | Tech ARP

Support Tech ARP!

Please support us by visiting our sponsors, participating in the Tech ARP Forums, or donating to our fund. Thank you!

Did Bernie Sanders Rape Boy On Tape 30 Years Ago?!

Claim : Bernie Sanders Raped Boy On Tape 30 Years Ago!

People are claiming or suggesting on social media that Senator Bernie Sanders was forced to rape a boy on tape 30 years ago!

Stew Peters : Bernie Sanders has been identified as the member of congress who is on tape allegedly raping a little boy in a basement 30 years ago.

Matt Wallace : A victim just came forward saying Bernie Sanders is the Senator who participated in the forced rape of a young boy on tape 30 years ago

Patrick Webb (screenshot, original deleted?) : BREAKING: An alleged video of Bernie Sanders being blackmailed to rape a little boy in a New York basement 30 years ago exists, according to whistleblower Jennifer Guskin.

Patrick Webb : BREAKING: Epstein victim alleges they were filmed being raped by a U.S. congressman as a form of blackmail who was being threatened the lives of their family if they didn’t comply.

Patrick Webb : The alleged incident occurred over 30 years in New York, and the congressman was Bernie Sanders (alleged).

Leading Report : BREAKING: Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has been accused of an alleged r*pe from 30 years ago by a user on X, whose name is Jennifer Guskin, and alleges it was videotaped as a form of blackmail.

Guskin attempted to sue the government for these claims but failed to “allege a claim cognizable under the Court of Federal Claims’ jurisdiction,” which was deemed inexcusable.

Basira Press : Survivor of a p*dophilia blackmail ring claims that Bernie Sanders was among those who partook in the rape of children.

Sanders is a liberal Zionist who lived on a Kibbutz on stolen Palestinian land. If the allegations of rape are true, would anyone be surprised?

Show less

Truth : Bernie Sanders Did Not Rape Boy On Tape 30 Years Ago!

This appears to be yet another example of fake news circulating online, and here are the reasons why…

Fact #1 : Bernie Sanders Was Never Formally Accused Of Rape

Let me start by pointing out that Senator Bernie Sanders has never been formally accused by anyone of rape.

These claims appear to originate from posts on X (formerly Twitter) by #Survivor – of Child Trafficking, who identified herself as Jennifer Guskin (archive):

#Survivor – of Child Trafficking : When I was a child, I was brought into a basement to be… violated.
While I was being raped, a man was dragged downstairs, and was told to rape a boy that was bent over in front of him, or they would the man and his family, who were lined up along a wall, where there was also a man behind a camera on a tripod.

Someone else came up to him, and told him “If you don’t do it, they will kill your family, and nothing can undo that, but if you do it, it’ll be fine, because that boy is used to it, and no one has to die”

To date, that’s the hardest I’ve ever seen a grown man cry. That man is currently sitting in Congress.

There is a system of bribery and blackmail controlling the upper echelons of society. The question is if someone “Did the deed” with a smile on their face because they knew their fortunes would improve, or if they did it with a tear in their eye because they didn’t want to hurt the child.

The only way we will be able to expose it is if the blackmailed and the children come together to name those who forced us.

TheRazorPigKid : If this is true, who is the man that is sitting in congress?

#Survivor – of Child Trafficking : Sanders. This was about 30 years ago. In NY.

Unfortunately, #Survivor – of Child Trafficking / Jennifer Gurkin never provided any evidence to back up her claims.

As shocking as these claims are, no one – neither #Survivor – of Child Trafficking / Jennifer Gurkin, nor the boy who was allegedly raped, or his family, ever filed a criminal complaint or lawsuit alleging rape by Bernie Sanders.

Fact #2 : Story Was Inconsistent

The original accusation claimed / suggested that Bernie Sanders and his family were dragged downstairs to the same basement where she was allegedly being raped. They lined up against the basement wall, and then Bernie Sanders allegedly raped the boy.

But in a later post (archive), the #Survivor – of Child Trafficking / Jennifer Gurkin said that Bernie Sanders family was in a van, and not in the basement. She also appears to suggest that she never actually saw Bernie Sanders rape the boy:

#Survivor – of Child Trafficking : I don’t believe his family was in the room for the actual rape, because after the man raping me was done, I went upstairs. Maybe 20 mins or so, Sanders came upstairs and was led out of a side door into a van where his family was.

Fact #3 : Bernie Sanders Lives In Vermont

Bernie Sanders has been living in Vermont since he married his first wife, Deborah Shiling Messing, in 1964.

Even after he married his second wife, Mary Jane O’Meara, in 1988, they lived in Vermont. They have a house in the New North End neighbourhood, and a lakefront summer house in North Hero. Bernie Sanders also owns a home in Capitol Hill, Washington D.C.

What is certain is that Bernie Sanders does not live in New York. While it might be plausible for people to kidnap him and bring him to a New York basement, it is highly implausible they would be able to capture his entire family, as alleged, and transport all of them to New York.

Fact #4 : His Children Were Adults At That Time

Bernie Sanders’ alleged forced rape of a boy allegedly took place 30 years ago – so it would have been about 1994, or thereabouts.

His only biological son – Levi Sanders, would have been 25 years at that time. Even his second wife’s children were adults at that time – Heather Titus was 23 years old, Carina Driscoll was 20 years old, while Dave Driscoll was 19 years old.

In short – Bernie Sanders’ only son and step-children were likely living separately when the alleged rape took place. So it would be quite impossible for anyone to track them all down, kidnap them at the same time, and then transport them all the way to a New York basement to watch their father / stepfather rape a boy.

Can you see just how ludicrous these claims are???

Fact #5 : Gurkin Lawsuit Had Nothing To Do With Bernie Sanders

While there are suggestions or claims that Jennifer Gurkin sued the government over these rape claims, that does not appear to be accurate.

According to the appeal judgement (PDF) of Jennifer Ruskin v United States, she sued the US government to have her daughter returned to her, as well as [monetary] damages. Senator Bernie Sanders was never mentioned in that lawsuit.

Her case was dismissed by the Federal Court, and her appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeals.

Please help us FIGHT FAKE NEWS by sharing this fact check article out, and please SUPPORT our work!

Don’t forget to protect yourself, and your family, by vaccinating against COVID-19!

Please Support My Work!

Support my work through a bank transfer / PayPal / credit card!

Name : Adrian Wong
Bank Transfer : CIMB 7064555917 (Swift Code : CIBBMYKL)
Credit Card / Paypal : https://paypal.me/techarp

Dr. Adrian Wong has been writing about tech and science since 1997, even publishing a book with Prentice Hall called Breaking Through The BIOS Barrier (ISBN 978-0131455368) while in medical school.

He continues to devote countless hours every day writing about tech, medicine and science, in his pursuit of facts in a post-truth world.

Recommended Reading

Go Back To > Fact Check | Celebrity | Tech ARP

Support Tech ARP!

Please support us by visiting our sponsors, participating in the Tech ARP Forums, or donating to our fund. Thank you!

Do mRNA vaccines have 1 in 800 severe adverse event rate?!

Claim : mRNA Vaccines Have 1-in-800 Severe Adverse Event Rate!

People are sharing a Twitter (X) post by Leading Report, which suggests that a landmark paper has shown that mRNA vaccines have severe adverse event rates, and is therefore dangerous and should be pulled from the market.

BRAKING: Landmark paper shows the COVID vaccine has a 1/800 severe adverse event rate; in comparison, the swine flu vaccine was pulled from the market for 1/100,000.

This study was also mentioned in a video (example) featuring Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson that is circulating on X (formerly Twitter) in January 2024.

17 million deaths from the Covid vaccine? That’s like the death toll of a global war!

– Yes, absolutely, this is a great tragedy of history, it’s of that proportion.

@TuckerCarlson speaks with @BretWeinstein

Truth : mRNA Vaccines Were Not Proven Dangerous!

This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS about the mRNA vaccines, and here are the reasons why…

Fact #1 : The Study Was Published In September 2022

First, let me just point out that the study in question isn’t new. It was actually published in the journal Vaccine on September 22, 2022, and you can read the full version here.

This study was even mentioned earlier by Dr. Aseem Malhotra in an interview with Joe Rogan several months ago, which you can read here. Perhaps that’s why Leading Report labelled the news as “BRAKING”, instead of “BREAKING”?

Here is an excerpt from the Fraiman, et. al. study:

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We adapted the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trials.

Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on Brighton Collaboration adverse events of special interest.

The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.

Show less

Fact #2 : The Study Looked At Reported AESI, Not Side Effects

The Fraiman et. al. study looked at Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) reported in the original Phase 3 trials of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines from 2020. It’s short, so I’m reproducing the results here for your convenience:

Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively.

Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92).

The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83).

The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI -23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33).

Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI -3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39).

Show less

As you can see, the Fraiman et. al. study looked at “serious adverse events“, not side effects.

Fact #3 : Adverse Events Are Not Necessarily Side Effects

I should now point out that Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) are not necessarily vaccine side effects. That’s why they are called “adverse events“, and not “side effects“.

Adverse events are “unfavourable” or “unintended” events that happen after vaccination or taking a drug, – which may or may not be caused by the vaccine / drug – like having an anaphylactic reaction, or getting into a car accident.

All reported adverse events have to be investigated to find out if they are related (anaphylactic reaction) or not (getting into a car accident) to the vaccine or drug that was taken.

Even if an adverse event was “possibly caused” by the vaccine, it must still be confirmed that the vaccine directly caused it, because an anaphylactic reaction (for example) can also occur from a bee sting, or an existing peanut allergy.

Only once an adverse event is confirmed to be caused by the vaccine, is it then a vaccine side effect. Otherwise, it is merely an adverse event, not a side effect.

Fact #4 : Brighton AESI List Is More Specific

Unlike the much wider AESI list of 1,291 adverse events used by Pfizer, the priority AESI list from the Brighton Collaboration is much more specific. You can download the December 2020 version here (PDF).

While the Brighton Collaboration AESI list is more specific, it includes adverse events that may not be related to the vaccine itself. As stated at the top of its Executive Summary on Page 4, the AESI list was created based on:

known association with immunization or a specific vaccine platform;
theoretical association based on animal models;
occurrence during wild-type disease as a result of viral replication and/or immunopathogenesis.

As noted in Fact #3, these adverse events are not necessarily vaccine side effects. Again, that’s why they are called “adverse events”, and not “side effects”.

Fact #5 : The Study Used An Expanded Brighton AESI List

At first glance, one may be forgiven for thinking that the Fraiman et. al. study used the more specific Brighton Collaboration AESI list.

However, they actually expanded the Brighton list with 29 additional adverse events that the Brighton Collaboration rejected because they were “known to have been reported but not in sufficient numbers to merit inclusion on the AESI list“.

The 29 additional adverse events (see Page 8) that Brighton Collaboration declined to include in the priority list, but the authors added anyway include adverse events like:

abscess, alopecia, conjunctivitis, mania, psychosis
breast milk, ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy, neonatal diagnoses, foetal diagnoses
host-specific diagnoses not related to pregnancy : geriatric, HIV

You can clearly see why the Brighton Collaboration refused to include many of those adverse events – they were most definitely not related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects!

In other words – the Fraiman et. al. study was skewed by the inclusion of 29 additional adverse events that were expressly rejected by the Brighton Collaboration.

Fact #6 : Study Did Not Prove mRNA Vaccines Are Dangerous

While Leading Report suggested in its post that the Fraiman et. al. study showed that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are 125X more dangerous than the swine flu vaccine that was withdrawn from the market, that is not the case at all.

The study offered ZERO EVIDENCE that the mRNA vaccines increased the risk of death or hospitalisation or injury. Neither did it show that the risks of getting the mRNA vaccines exceeded its benefits.

There is already a lot of data on actual, proven COVID-19 vaccine side effects, after more than 20 months of vaccinations (from December 2020 until September 2022). If they wanted to prove that the mRNA vaccines are dangerous, they could have reanalysed the original Phase 3 trial data using proven serious side effects, not serious adverse events.

Unfortunately, they chose to use adverse events instead of side effects, and ended up proving nothing in their study. What a waste of time.

More than a year after this study was published, not only have the mRNA vaccines not been withdrawn from the market, improved versions of the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 have been approved! That would hardly be the case, if this was really a landmark study, would it?

Please help us fight fake news – SHARE this article, and SUPPORT our work!

Don’t forget to protect yourself, and your family, by vaccinating against COVID-19!

Please Support My Work!

Support my work through a bank transfer / PayPal / credit card!

Name : Adrian Wong
Bank Transfer : CIMB 7064555917 (Swift Code : CIBBMYKL)
Credit Card / Paypal : https://paypal.me/techarp

Dr. Adrian Wong has been writing about tech and science since 1997, even publishing a book with Prentice Hall called Breaking Through The BIOS Barrier (ISBN 978-0131455368) while in medical school.

He continues to devote countless hours every day writing about tech, medicine and science, in his pursuit of facts in a post-truth world.

Recommended Reading

Go Back To > Fact Check | Health | Tech ARP

Support Tech ARP!

Please support us by visiting our sponsors, participating in the Tech ARP Forums, or donating to our fund. Thank you!