Did New York Times Rank Chinese Vaccines As World Safest?

Spread the love

Did the New York Times rank four Chinese COVID-19 vaccines as the safest in the world?

Find out what keeps going viral, and what the FACTS really are!

 

Did New York Times Rank Chinese Vaccines As World Safest?

People have been excitedly sharing this amazing news about Chinese vaccines on Facebook and WhatsApp :

Report by The New York Times on Feb 5, 2021.

In the safety ranking, the top four are all Chinese vaccines:

🇨🇳 1. Sinopharm (China)
🇨🇳 2. Sinovac (China)
🇨🇳 3. Kexing (China)
🇨🇳 4. Can Sino (China)
🇬🇧 5. AstraZeneca (UK)
🇺🇸 🇩🇪 6. Pfizer (United States and Germany)
🇺🇸 7. Modena (United States)
🇺🇸 8. Johnson & Johnson (United States)
🇺🇸 9. Novavax (United States)
🇷🇺 10. Satellite 5 (Russia)

Sinopharm has two vaccines, ranking first and second respectively.

China has exported more than 500 million doses of vaccines to more than 50 countries around the world, and it is estimated that hundreds of millions of people have been vaccinated. And China’s vaccine accident rate is lower and safer.

As reported by Western media, many wealthy people in Britain fly to the UAE to vaccinate Chinese national medicine.

It appears to be an English translation of this original Chinese post by a Facebook user called Tai Shing Suen.

轉:
向大家提供一點參考資料:① 經常發反華言論的紐約時報約兩星期前竟發文《是時候相信中俄的疫苗了》,②德國著名的反華傳媒《德國之聲》把全球十種新冠疫苗的安全性排名,排頭四位的也竟然全是中國疫苗:
1.國藥(中國)
2. 國藥(中國)
3. 科興(中國)
4. 康希諾(中國)
5. 阿斯利康(英國)
6. 輝瑞(美國及德國)
7. 莫德納(美國)
8. 強生(美國)
9. Novavax(美國)
10. 衛星五號(俄羅斯)
國藥有兩種疫苗,分別排第一及二。
現在全球已有幾千萬人接種了輝瑞,都只是集體死了二、三十人及幾十人面癱,出事率其實很低,算安全。中國已向全球50多個國家輸出超過5億劑疫苗,估計已接種的人也有幾億,只有香港錄得一例疑似與接種疫苗有關的死亡個案,而死者本身有糖尿、高血壓、高血脂及心臟血管疾病,港府顧問醫生許樹昌及呼吸系統專科醫生梁子超均說,其死因未必直接與接種科興疫苗有關,但有待調查公布。所以,中國疫苗出事率更低,也更安全。
各人可因應自己的情況決定是否接種或選擇那一隻接種,正如有西方媒體報導,英國很多有錢人特登飛去阿聯酋接種中國國藥。

 

NO, New York Times Did NOT Rank Chinese Vaccines As World Safest

The posts above are FALSE and intentionally misleading. And here are the facts…

Fact #1 : It Was An Opinion Piece, Not An Actual NYT Article

The posts promoted a New York Times link, but it was really just an opinion piece by Achal Prabhala and Chee Yoke Ling – an Indian public health activist and a Malaysian public interest lawyer.

It was NOT an actual article by any New York Times writer or correspondent. Neither was it endorsed by the New York Times.

Fact #2 : There Was No Safety Ranking Of Vaccines

The opinion piece did NOT rank the safety of any vaccine.

In fact, it pointed out that the conflicting trial results for the CoronaVac vaccine from Sinovac, and noted that “China’s and Russia’s self-serving propaganda campaigns touting their respective vaccines only increased wariness“.

Instead of praising Chinese vaccines as the safest in the world, the two writers are merely asking health authorities to “start trusting other countries’ vaccines“, because there is simply not enough vaccines from Western countries to supply the world.

Did NYT Rank 4 Chinese Vaccines As Safest In The World?

Fact #3 : The New York Times Refuted The Claim

On 10 March 2021, The New York Times published three tweets refuting the false claims.

We are aware of misinformation circulating on WhatsApp, which falsely ranks the safety of worldwide coronavirus vaccines and attributes this list to a report published by The New York Times.

This message is misleading and untrue. The New York Times did not publish this list, our reporting has not suggested that Chinese vaccines are superior to vaccines produced elsewhere, nor have we published claims that China has exported more than 500 million doses.

Our understanding of the effectiveness and safety of vaccines is published in The New York Times Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker. It is evolving, nuanced, and regularly updated to reflect current scientific evidence.

Fact #4 : No Phase 3 Trial Results Published At That Time

Chinese vaccine manufacturers have long shied from publishing their Phase 3 trial data.

When we first posted this fact check in March 2021, both Sinopharm and Sinovac declined to publish their Phase 3 trial data.

Instead, they chose to issue press releases. For example, on 5 February 2021, Sinovac announced the results of their CoronaVac Phase 3 trials from Brazil and Turkey, without releasing the actual data.

China promptly approved the public use of CoronaVac the very next day. This would not be possible for vaccines approved in the US and Europe.

Back then, we pointed out that Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Oxford-AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and even Russia’s Gamaleya Institute released Phase 3 trial data of their vaccines for peer review.

Sinopharm finally published their Phase 3 trial data on 27 May 2021. Sinovac has yet to publish their Phase 3 trial data, as of 6 June 2021.

Fact #5 : Doses Ordered, Not Delivered

The post claimed that “China has exported more than 500 million doses of vaccines to more than 50 countries around the world, and it is estimated that hundreds of millions of people have been vaccinated.”

The truth is Chinese vaccine manufacturers received ORDERS for about 500 million doses of their vaccines from about 45 countries.

They are actually a long way from delivering (exporting) those 500 million vaccine doses, and certainly hundreds of millions of people have NOT been vaccinated with Chinese COVID-19 vaccines.

Fact #6 : China Purchased 100 Million Doses Of Pfizer Vaccine

Despite the claims of Chinese vaccine superiority and approving FOUR domestically developed and produced vaccines, it has vaccinated very few of its population.

China only planned to vaccinate 50 million essential workers by mid-February – less than 4% of its population, even as it exports millions of doses overseas.

That is probably why China itself ordered 100 million doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

Fact #7 : Flying For Early Vaccines, Not Chinese Vaccines

While the fake post insinuates that wealthy UK residents are flying to the UAE for superior Chinese vaccines, the truth is they were offered EARLY ACCESS to COVID-19 vaccines.

Knightsbridge Circle – a private concierge service – had been flying people since January 2021 to the UAE for the Pfizer vaccine, or India for the AstraZeneca vaccine.

In February 2021, they partnered with the UAE to offer the Sinopharm vaccine as a way to “bring tourism into the area”.

This is really about the rich cutting queue and getting early access to COVID-19 vaccines, and not about wealthy UK residents actually believing in the superiority of Chinese vaccines.

Knightsbridge Circle Sinopharm COVID-19

 

Chinese Vaccines : Should You Take Them?

Yes, if approved by the health authority of your country, you should take it.

The Chinese vaccines may have lower efficacy than the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccine, but they are still effective vaccines.

We need to stop obsessing over efficacy rates because most people don’t understand them.

What we really need to understand is that ALL approved COVID-19 vaccines have been proven to prevent severe or fatal COVID-19 disease.

Just take any approved COVID-19 vaccine, and you will be protected against moderate to severe COVID-19 disease that requires medical treatment.

Recommended : Which COVID-19 Vaccine Should YOU Choose?

 

Help Support My Work!

If you would like to support my work, you can do so via bank transfer /  PayPal / credit card.

Name : Adrian Wong

Credit Card / Paypal : https://paypal.me/techarp
Bank Transfer : CIMB 7064555917 (Swift Code : CIBBMYKL)

Thank you in advanced! ❤️

 

Recommended Reading

Go Back To > Science | Fact Check | Home

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support us by visiting our sponsors, participating in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donating to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

About The Author

Leave a Reply