The 1TB WD Blue SSD (WDS100T1B0A) Review

Spread the love

Page 6 : IO Meter (Random & Sequential) Benchmark Results

IO Meter

We compared the 1TB WD Blue SSD against the 240 GB HyperX Savage. If you wish to see how the WD Blue SSD compares to other solid state drives, take a look at our Solid State Drive Performance Comparison Guide, which we will be updating shortly.

 

Throughput (Random Access)

The 1TB WD Blue SSD - iometer random speed

Test1 TB WD Blue SSD240 GB HyperX SavageDifference
512 KB Read239.84 MB/s371.76 MB/s– 35.5%
512 KB Write257.09 MB/s488.15 MB/s– 47.3%
4 KB Read24.93 MB/s27.57 MB/s– 9.6%
4 KB Write53.31 MB/s53.52 MB/s

The small random reads and writes are the most important tests for applications that make a lot of random accesses, so these would be key performance indicators for SSDs that are often used as boot drives.

The 1TB WD Blue SSD held up well in small reads and writes, matching the 240 GB HyperX Savage SSD in writes, and coming in just 10% slower in reads. The large SDRAM cache seems to be doing its job very well.

However, it was much slower when it came to large reads and writes. This is due to the TLC the Phison S10 controller used in the HyperX Savage has twice the NAND channels of the WD Blue’s Marvell 88SS1074 controller.

 

Random Access Time

The 1TB WD Blue SSD - iometer random access

Test1 TB WD Blue SSD240 GB HyperX SavageDifference
512 KB Read2.19 ms1.41 ms– 35.6%
512 KB Write2.04 ms1.07 ms– 47.5%
4 KB Read0.17 ms0.15 ms– 11.8%
4 KB Write0.08 ms0.08 ms

The small random write access time of the 1TB WD Blue SSD was completely masked by the large SDRAM cache, allowing it to match the performance of the 240 GB HyperX Savage SSD. The small random read access time was also very good, coming within 12% of the HyperX Savage. However, due to the lack of NAND channels, its large access times were almost twice as long.

 

Random CPU Utilization

The 1TB WD Blue SSD - iometer random CPU

Test1 TB WD Blue SSD240 GB HyperX SavageDifference
512 KB Read7.16 %1.62 %+ 342.0%
512 KB Write7.31 %1.81 %+ 303.9%
4 KB Read9.94 %4.27 %+ 132.8%
4 KB Write11.91 %8.97 %+ 32.8%

For some reason, the 1TB WD Blue SSD took up considerably more CPU time than the HyperX Savage SSD.

[adrotate banner=”5″]

 

IO Meter (Sequential Accesses)

We compared the 1TB WD Blue SSD against the 240 GB HyperX SavageIf you wish to see how the WD Blue SSD compares to other solid state drives, take a look at our Solid State Drive Performance Comparison Guide, which we will be updating shortly.

 

Sequential Throughput

The 1TB WD Blue SSD - iometer sequential speed

Test1 TB WD Blue SSD240 GB HyperX SavageDifference
512 KB Read250.14 MB/s521.02 MB/s– 52.0%
512 KB Write255.54 MB/s486.12 MB/s– 47.4%
4 KB Read63.35 MB/s24.89 MB/s+ 154.5%
4 KB Write59.15 MB/s53.65 MB/s+ 10.3%

The sequential read and write performance indicators determine how fast you can copy and move files. This is also important in determining how fast you can launch an application or game.

The 1TB WD Blue SSD did very well when the sequential reads and writes were small. It was particular good at small sequential reads. However, when it came to large sequential accesses, the WD Blue’s limited NAND channels came into play… giving it half the throughput of the HyperX Savage SSD.

 

Sequential Access Time

The 1TB WD Blue SSD - iometer sequential access

Test1 TB WD Blue SSD240 GB HyperX SavageDifference
512 KB Read2.10 ms1.01 ms– 51.9%
512 KB Write2.05 ms1.08 ms– 47.3%
4 KB Read0.07 ms0.16 ms+ 128.6%
4 KB Write0.07 ms0.08 ms+ 14.3%

 

Sequential CPU Utilization

The 1TB WD Blue SSD - iometer sequential CPU

Test1 TB WD Blue SSD240 GB HyperX SavageDifference
512 KB Read8.69 %1.74 %+ 399.4%
512 KB Write5.76 %2.17 %+ 165.4%
4 KB Read15.93 %3.71 %+ 329.4%
4 KB Write15.42 %9.34 %+ 65.1%

Again, the 1TB WD Blue SSD required a lot more CPU time than the HyperX Savage SSD.

Next Page > IOPS Scaling (Random) Results

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support our work by visiting our sponsors, participating in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donating to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

About The Author

2 Comments

  1. Pingback: Daily Roundup: 2017-01-13 - Bjorn3D.com

  2. Pingback: How To Choose The Best Drive For Your PC - Tech ARP

Leave a Reply