AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Gaming Performance Part 1
Contents
Synthetic Game Test – 3DMark
We used 3DMark’s Time Spy and Time Spy Extreme synthetic benchmarks, which supports DirectX 12, and the latest features like asynchronous compute, and multi-threading support.
Time Spy – 2560 x 1440
The AMD Ryzen 3 3300X was 7% faster than the Ryzen 3 3100, and just 14% slower than the Ryzen 5 1600X.
Of course, the CPU only has a slight influence on a game’s performance, so its effect on the overall gaming score is less significant.
Ultimately, it was just 2% faster than the Ryzen 3 3100, and only 3% slower than the Ryzen 5 1600X or Ryzen 5 2600X!
Time Spy Extreme – 3840 x 2160
At the higher 4K resolution, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X was 9% faster than the Ryzen 3 3100, and 6.7% slower than the Ryzen 5 1600X.
Now check out the processors’ effect on the overall gaming score…
At 4K, it was virtually as fast as the Ryzen 5 1600X, edging out the Ryzen 3 3100 by just 2%.
F1 2019
F1 2019 is a relatively recent racing game by Codemasters, released on 28 June 2019.
We tested it on three resolutions at the Ultra High settings :
- 1080p : 1920 x 1080
- 1440p : 2560 x 1440
1080p Gaming Resolution
Will you look at that! This is why the number of CPU cores don’t really matter when it comes to games.
The cheap Ryzen 3 3300X delivered average frame rates on par with the 8-core Ryzen 7 2700X!
1440p Gaming Resolution
At the higher 1440p resolution, the importance of CPU performance was greatly reduced. It didn’t matter which processor you used – they all delivered about the same frame rates.
Next Page > Gaming Performance Part 2, Our Verdict + Award
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support our work by visiting our sponsors, participating in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donating to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
