Add to Reddit
IO Meter - 4 KB Sequential Access Performance
USB Flash Drive |
Interface |
Read Speed |
Write Speed |
Average |
Difference |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 3.0 |
33.81 MB/s |
39.51 MB/s |
115.10 MB/s |
Baseline |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 3.0 |
23.61 MB/s |
30.62 MB/s |
27.12 MB/s |
- 26.0% |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 2.0 |
8.19 MB/s |
8.19 MB/s |
8.19 MB/s |
- 77.7% |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 3.0 |
7.44 MB/s |
7.65 MB/s |
7.50 MB/s |
- 79.4% |
OCZ Rally 2 |
USB 2.0 |
7.79 MB/s |
2.06 MB/s |
4.93 MB/s |
- 86.6% |
Active Media Wink |
USB 2.0 |
7.81 MB/s |
0.29 MB/s |
4.05 MB/s |
- 89.0% |
SanDisk Cruzer Micro SDCZ6 |
USB 2.0 |
6.25 MB/s |
1.65 MB/s |
3.95 MB/s |
- 89.2% |
Kingston DataTraveler DT110G |
USB 2.0 |
6.95 MB/s |
0.52 MB/s |
3.74 MB/s |
- 89.8% |
Corsair Flash Voyager |
USB 2.0 |
5.18 MB/s |
1.18 MB/s |
3.18 MB/s |
- 91.3% |
The 64 GB OCZ Enyo was very fast at small 4 KB sequential accesses. Surprisingly, its write speed was much higher than its read speed. Either way, it was a mile ahead of its competitors.
In the USB 2.0 mode, the OCZ Enyo was faster than its competitors but the gap between it and the Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 narrowed significantly to just 10%.
IO Meter - 512 KB Sequential Access Performance
USB Flash Drive |
Interface |
Read Speed |
Write Speed |
Average |
Difference |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 3.0 |
188.87 MB/s |
106.26 MB/s |
147.57 MB/s |
Baseline |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 3.0 |
91.32 MB/s |
66.58 MB/s |
78.95 MB/s |
- 46.5% |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 2.0 |
36.70 MB/s |
30.91 MB/s |
33.81 MB/s |
- 77.1% |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 2.0 |
33.34 MB/s |
26.86 MB/s |
30.10 MB/s |
- 79.6% |
SanDisk Cruzer Micro SDCZ6 |
USB 2.0 |
28.62 MB/s |
8.44 MB/s |
18.53 MB/s |
- 87.4% |
OCZ Rally 2 |
USB 2.0 |
29.35 MB/s |
7.29 MB/s |
18.32 MB/s |
- 87.6% |
Active Media Wink |
USB 2.0 |
29.61 MB/s |
5.44 MB/s |
17.53 MB/s |
- 88.1% |
Corsair Flash Voyager |
USB 2.0 |
19.10 MB/s |
10.27 MB/s |
14.69 MB/s |
- 90.0% |
Kingston DataTraveler DT110G |
USB 2.0 |
17.62 MB/s |
9.82 MB/s |
13.72 MB/s |
- 90.7% |
This is the most important test if you intend to use the OCZ Enyo as a large flash drive. It is twice as fast as the Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 at reads and 60% faster at writes. Even when used with a USB 2.0 port, the OCZ Enyo was faster than the DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0, just with a smaller difference.
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
||
2 |
||
3 |
• The 64 GB OCZ Enyo Solid State Drive |
|
4 |
||
5 |
||
6 |
||
7 |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
11 |
||
12 |
||
13 |
<<< IO Meter Random Access Performance : Previous Page | Next Page : USB 3.0 Vs. USB 2.0 Comparison (Random) >>>
