Add to Reddit
IO Meter - USB 3.0 Vs. USB 2.0 (Random Access)
In these tests, we compared the USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 performance of the OCZ Enyo.
Throughput (Random Access)
Test |
USB 3.0 |
USB 2.0 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
130.60 MB/s |
35.48 MB/s |
+ 268.1% |
512 KB Write |
99.59 MB/s |
30.88 MB/s |
+ 222.5% |
4 KB Read |
20.88 MB/s |
8.19 MB/s |
+ 154.9% |
4 KB Write |
7.98 MB/s |
8.11 MB/s |
- 1.6% |
Random Access Time
Test |
USB 3.0 |
USB 2.0 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
28.98 ms |
34.61 ms |
- 72.9% |
512 KB Write |
43.56 ms |
40.43 ms |
- 69.0% |
4 KB Read |
27.64 ms |
26.18 ms |
- 60.0% |
4 KB Write |
24.30 ms |
23.24 ms |
+ 2.0% |
CPU Utilization (Random Access)
Test |
USB 3.0 |
USB 2.0 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
1.55% |
1.28% |
+ 21.1% |
512 KB Write |
0.98% |
0.72% |
+ 36.1% |
4 KB Read |
3.80% |
4.23% |
- 10.2% |
4 KB Write |
1.38% |
4.61% |
- 70.1% |
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
||
2 |
||
3 |
• The 64 GB OCZ Enyo Solid State Drive |
|
4 |
||
5 |
||
6 |
||
7 |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
11 |
||
12 |
||
13 |
<<< IO Meter Sequential Access Performance : Previous Page | Next Page : USB 3.0 Vs. USB 2.0 Comparison (Sequential) >>>
