Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 07 March 2009
 N/A
  N/A
 Software
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 PR3
 Discuss here !
 97786
 
   
BIOS Option Of The Week - AGP to DRAM Prefetch
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
The Tech ARP 2014 Mega Giveaway Contest (Week 10)
We have been working hard to arrange a ton of prizes, which we will give away every w... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
An Inside Look Into The New Windows 7 Experience Index!
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

How Does The CPU Score Correlate With User Experience?

As with graphics, Microsoft feels it is helpful to consider how user experiences would map to the core computation score.

  • < 2.0  means the processor is extremely slow and not well suited for a Windows 7 experience.
     
  • 2.0 to 2.9 maps to single-tasking “every day” computing scenarios such as reading mail, browsing the web, editing Word documents and PowerPoint slides, and editing basic spreadsheets.
    - With this class of processors, even the most basic things can push the CPU to high utilization levels.
    - Multi-tasking will contend for CPU time in a manner that causes notable responsiveness issues.
    - Some websites that make heavy use of Flash, Silverlight, or Java may run poorly.
    - Audio ripping takes a noticeably longer time than on faster systems and pushes the system to long periods of 100% CPU utilizations. Even simple video encoding tasks are not very practical.
     
  • 3.0 to 3.9 maps to basic multi-tasking “every day” computing tasks. 
    - There is enough CPU capacity to do basic multi-tasking. For example, background printing would not interfere with a foreground task. Everyday tasks generally do not push the processor to high utilizations, but there may be noticeable responsiveness issues occasionally due to contention for CPU time.
    - Flash, Silverlight and Java-heavy websites run acceptably well.
    - Audio-ripping performance is acceptable, though it may not be effective to let this happen in the background.
    - Video encoding tasks such as encoding a consumer camera AVI video for a portable media device  are practical; but may take a bit long. For example, encoding a 20 second clip may take about 40 seconds on a 3.9 processor and much longer on a 3.0.
     
  • 4.0 to 4.9 maps to a robust every day computing and good multi-tasking experiences.
    - “Every day” computing tasks, even when multi-tasking, do not push the CPU to high utilizations.
    - Responsiveness due to contention for CPU time is rarely a problem.
    - Audio-ripping performs well and can be done in the background without adversely affecting basic tasks like web browsing, even on sites with Flash, Silverlight or Java.
    - Flash, Silverlight and Java-heavy websites run very smoothly.
    - Video encoding tasks run well on these system; on the faster systems, videos can be encoded in times shorter than the length of the clip.
    - Basic games are not CPU-limited, but the more demanding ones are.
     
  • 5.0 to 5.9 maps to a robust multi-tasking experience.
    - “Every day” computing tasks, audio ripping, and video encoding do not push the CPU to even moderate utilizations.
    - It is very practical to rip audio and encode video while doing other tasks.
    - Things that leverage multi-core processing show good scaling as compared to 4.X including Excel, image processing, and compiling software. All but the most demanding games are not CPU-limited.
     
  • 6.0 to 6.9 and 7.0 to 7.9 give the user an experience that is rarely CPU bound.
    - Multi-tasking is friction-free. On these systems, multi-core enabled applications and scenarios show major performance benefits over the lower levels.
    - Scenarios include very large Excel spreadsheets, sophisticated graphics rendering, software compiling and scientific applications.

There is a challenge with mapping triple-core processors to 6+ and quad-core processors to 7+ as there are currently few broadly-applicable scenarios that benefit from these high end processors. Microsoft has drawn the line between 5/6 and 6/7 based primarily on the performance associated with the number of cores. This allows room to accommodate improved hardware that may ship over the next few years.

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

Page

Topic

1

Introduction
What Is The Windows Experience Index?

2

How Is The New Scoring System Similar To That Of Windows Vista?
So What's Changed In Windows 7?

3

Will My System Get The Same Score From Windows 7 As Windows Vista?
Memory Performance & Size

4

CPU Core Computations
Addition Of A Single-Threaded CPU Assessment

5

How Does The CPU Score Correlate With User Experience?

6

Storage System Performance

7

Write Flush Policy Tests
Assessing Enhanced Storage Systems

8

Storage Test FAQs

9

Storage Test FAQs (Continued)

10

DX10 Gaming
DX10 Scoring Rules

11

Items Under Investigation
DX10 & WDDM 1.1 Drivers
DX10 Graphics For DWM

12

High Definition Video Playback

13

What's Not Tested?
Features & Concepts No Longer Included
Other Microsoft Scoops



 
   
Windows Vista & Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 FAQs
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Overclocking Guide Rev. 3.0
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB Review Rev. 2.0
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT Graphics Card Review Rev. 2.0
ITJournoAsia Interviews Adrian Wong
ASUS V6000V Notebook Overview
ASUS W5000A Notebook Overview
Spire CoolGate Pentium 4 Heatpipe Cooler Review
Jetart Xcool NP3000 Portable Notebook Cooler Review
Warcraft III : Frozen Throne

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.