Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 15 November 2008
 N/A
  N/A
 CPU
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 38934
 
   
Mobile CPU Comparison Guide Rev. 10.7
There are so many CPU models that it has become quite impossible to keep up with the ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - EXT-P2P's Discard Time
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
The Intel Core i7 Memory Bandwidth
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

The Intel Core i7 Memory Bandwidth

We have always advocated larger memory capacities over higher memory bandwidth to improve a PC's real-world performance. Note that we are talking about real-world performance here, not benchmark results. For us, what matters most is how fast we can really get the job done, rather than just some arbitrary number that shows you the maximum speed a component is capable of.

The effect of high memory bandwidth have always been overhyped by memory vendors, because it makes good business sense. Unfortunately, some tech writers have fallen into the same trap of reading too much into benchmark numbers and ignoring actual real-world performance. This is the situation we now see with the introduction of the new Intel Core i7 processor.

The Core i7 processor supports up to three DDR3 memory channels. That is an additional memory channel over what the industry is using now - dual memory channels. As some are fond of pointing out, 3 memory channels will automatically give 50 % more memory bandwidth over 2 memory channels even if everything else remains the same. Great, isn't it?

Using DDR3-1333 memory, triple-channels would give you a memory bandwidth of 64 GB/s. That is a tremendous amount of memory bandwidth. But do we really, really need that kind of bandwidth? That is what we will be looking at today.

 

 

Do Memory Channels Really Matter?

In these tests, we used the Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition running at 3.2 GHz. The L3 cache was set to run at 2.6 GHz. The DDR3 memory modules were set to run at 1066 MHz with timings of 7-7-7-20. Power Director 7 was used to convert 3 minutes of a HD video (1080), while Cinebench was set to use all 8 threads.

 

Power Director 7

Even with 50 % more memory bandwidth, Power Director 7 was just 9 seconds faster with 3 memory channels than it was with 2 memory channels. That's a completely negligible difference of 1 %.

Running with a single memory channel did result in a much longer render time. Power Director 7 took 84 seconds longer to complete the conversion. That's a difference of almost 11 %, compared to the conversion times with 2 or 3 memory channels.

 

Cinebench 10

Wow.. Even with all 4 cores fully occupied, increased memory bandwidth did not seem to help Cinebench render the scene any faster. Running with triple memory channels only speeded up the rendering by 1 second, which is completely insignificant.

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

Page

Topic

1

Introduction
Do Memory Channels Really Matter?

2

What About Increasing Memory Speed?
Conclusion



Next Page : What About Increasing Memory Speed?, Conclusion >>>

 
   
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Tech Report
Western Digital RE (WD4000FYYZ) 4 TB Hard Disk Drive Review Rev. 2.0
CPU Performance Comparison Guide Rev. 6.6
The Intel Larrabee Processor Tech Report
The CPU & Heatsink Lapping Guide
Arctic Cooling Accelero X1 Graphics Card Cooler Review
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS Tech Report
Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED Lens Review Rev. 1.1
ATI Radeon Cooler Mod Guide

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.