Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 13 November 2008
 N/A
  N/A
 Storage
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 86683
 
   
Mobile CPU Comparison Guide Rev. 10.7
There are so many CPU models that it has become quite impossible to keep up with the ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - EXT-P2P's Discard Time
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
A Tale Of Two VelociRaptors
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Surface Temperature

We monitored the surface temperature of both hard drives during their benchmarks. The following chart shows their operating temperature range, from idle to maximum load. Please note that instead of giving you the absolute numbers, we are showing the temperature delta, which is the difference between the actual temperature and the ambient room temperature.

Surprisingly, the VelociRaptor HLFS' IcePack mounting frame had a significant effect on its operating temperature. Even though there was only four contact points and the mounting frame itself was barely (1.2 °C) warmer than the ambient temperature, the mounting frame (which also serves as a heatsink) dropped the VelociRaptor HLFS' load temperature by 6.4 °C. In fact, at full load, the VelociRaptor HLFS is actually 1.2 °C cooler than the VelociRaptor BLFS at idle!

Based on the results, the VelociRaptor HLFS with its IcePack mounting frame certainly has an advantage over the VelociRaptor BLFS bare drive. With that said, a temperature delta of 13.2 °C isn't particularly hot. Even with an ambient temperature of 35 °C, the actual surface temperature would only be 48.2 °C. To put things into perspective, the VelociRaptor HLFS would have a maximum surface temperature of 41.8 °C at the same ambient temperature.

 

WinBench 99 Version 2.0

Platter Data Transfer Profile

As expected, both the VelociRaptor BLFS and the VelociRaptor HFLS have the same platter transfer rate profile. However, the VelociRaptor BLFS appears to be consistently higher transfer rates across the platter.

Page

Topic

1

The VelociRaptors
Performance Difference?

2

Testing The VelociRaptors

3

Surface Temperature
Platter Data Transfer Profile

4

Winbench 99 Results

5

IO Meter (Random Reads & Writes) Results

6

IO Meter (Sequential Reads & Writes) Results

7

Conclusion

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!



<<< Testing The VelociRaptors : Previous Page   |   Next Page : WinBench 99 Version 2.0 >>>

 
   
x264 HD Benchmark Ver. 5.0.1
Western Digital Caviar Green (Advanced Format) 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
Samsung EcoGreen F2 (HD154UI) 1.5 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
Samsung SGH-D880 Dual SIM Mobile Phone Review
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Mobile GPU Review Rev. 2.0
Aztech Modem Bad Flash Recovery Guide Rev. 2.0
Seagate 750GB Pushbutton Backup Review
XFX GeForce 7900 GT Extreme Edition Graphics Card Review
Mushkin 2GB HP3200 Dual Channel Memory Kit Review
Cooler Master HAC-V81 @ X-Dream Review

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.