Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 13 November 2008
 N/A
  N/A
 Storage
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 90967
 
   
Hard Disk Drive Performance Comparison Guide Rev. 5.5
Ever wanted a guide on hard drive performance, where you can compare the performance ... Read here
Desktop CPU Comparison Guide Rev. 15.3
There are so many CPU models that it has become quite impossible to keep up with the ... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
A Tale Of Two VelociRaptors
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Testing The VelociRaptors

The Testbed

Processors

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Motherboard

ASUS P5B-E Plus (Intel P965)

Memory

Two G.Skill 1GB PC2-6400 DDR2 modules
Two Kingston 512MB HyperX PC2-8500 DDR2 modules

Graphics Card

ASUS EN8800GTS 512MB

Hard Drives

300 GB Western Digital VelociRaptor BLFS
300 GB Western Digital VelociRaptor HLFS

Operating System

Microsoft Windows Vista 32-bit

 

Testing Methodology

We tested exclusively in Windows Vista, with the latest updates. We chose to use IO Meter as well as our "old faithful", WinBench 99 2.0, with the following tests :

  • Platter Data Transfer Profile
  • Business Disk WinMark 99
  • High-End Disk WinMark 99
  • Disk Transfer Rate (Beginning)
  • Disk Transfer Rate (End)

Business Disk WinMark 99 is a real-world simulation based on three office application suites - Microsoft Office 97, Lotus SmartSuite and Corel WordPerfect Suite 8, as well as a web browser, Netscape Navigator. They are quite dated, but should still reflect the usage patterns of users in an office environment using such applications. The test runs through a script that keeps multiple applications open, while it performs tasks that switches between those applications and Netscape Navigator. The result is the average transfer rate during the script run.

High-End Disk WinMark 99 is a real-world simulation based on AVS/Express 3.4, FrontPage 98, MicroStation SE, Photoshop 4.0, Premiere 4.2, Sound Forge 4.0 and Visual C++ 5.0. However, it differs by running the applications serially, instead of simultaneously. There are individual results for each application but in this comparison, we will be looking only at the weighted average score, which is the average transfer rate during the tests.

Unfortunately, WinBench 99 seemed to have some issues with Windows Vista, or the current Vista driver for the SATA controller. It would register a SetFilePointer error in the Disk Access Time test. So, we were not able to obtain any Disk Access Time results.

Page

Topic

1

The VelociRaptors
Performance Difference?

2

Testing The VelociRaptors

3

Surface Temperature
Platter Data Transfer Profile

4

Winbench 99 Results

5

IO Meter (Random Reads & Writes) Results

6

IO Meter (Sequential Reads & Writes) Results

7

Conclusion

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!



<<< The VelociRaptors, Performance Difference? : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Surface Temperature, Platter Data Transfer Profile >>>

 
   
Hard Disk Drive Myths Debunked Rev. 5.4
OCZ Agility 2 (E) 60 GB Solid State Drive Review
The ASUS Eee Box B204 & B206
Performance Improvements In Crysis 1.2
Intel Matrix RAID Guide
Corsair XMS4400 1GB TwinX Memory Kit Review
Steelpad S&S Professional Gaming Mouse Pad Review
Notebook Power-Up Guide
Power Factor Correction : Correction Required
ARP Chinese New Year Reunion Dinner

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.