Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 13 November 2008
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 Discuss here !
Unboxing The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 (Z370CG) Tablet Rev. 2.0
The new ASUS ZenPad 7.0 (Z370CG) is a quad-core Intel SoFIA-powered tablet with a 7" ... Read here
The Tech ARP 2015 Mega Giveaway #7 : LEAGOO Elite 4 Smartphone
This year, we are not only rewarding everyone who participates in the Tech ARP forums... Read here
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
A Tale Of Two VelociRaptors
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Testing The VelociRaptors

The Testbed


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650


ASUS P5B-E Plus (Intel P965)


Two G.Skill 1GB PC2-6400 DDR2 modules
Two Kingston 512MB HyperX PC2-8500 DDR2 modules

Graphics Card


Hard Drives

300 GB Western Digital VelociRaptor BLFS
300 GB Western Digital VelociRaptor HLFS

Operating System

Microsoft Windows Vista 32-bit


Testing Methodology

We tested exclusively in Windows Vista, with the latest updates. We chose to use IO Meter as well as our "old faithful", WinBench 99 2.0, with the following tests :

  • Platter Data Transfer Profile
  • Business Disk WinMark 99
  • High-End Disk WinMark 99
  • Disk Transfer Rate (Beginning)
  • Disk Transfer Rate (End)

Business Disk WinMark 99 is a real-world simulation based on three office application suites - Microsoft Office 97, Lotus SmartSuite and Corel WordPerfect Suite 8, as well as a web browser, Netscape Navigator. They are quite dated, but should still reflect the usage patterns of users in an office environment using such applications. The test runs through a script that keeps multiple applications open, while it performs tasks that switches between those applications and Netscape Navigator. The result is the average transfer rate during the script run.

High-End Disk WinMark 99 is a real-world simulation based on AVS/Express 3.4, FrontPage 98, MicroStation SE, Photoshop 4.0, Premiere 4.2, Sound Forge 4.0 and Visual C++ 5.0. However, it differs by running the applications serially, instead of simultaneously. There are individual results for each application but in this comparison, we will be looking only at the weighted average score, which is the average transfer rate during the tests.

Unfortunately, WinBench 99 seemed to have some issues with Windows Vista, or the current Vista driver for the SATA controller. It would register a SetFilePointer error in the Disk Access Time test. So, we were not able to obtain any Disk Access Time results.




The VelociRaptors
Performance Difference?


Testing The VelociRaptors


Surface Temperature
Platter Data Transfer Profile


Winbench 99 Results


IO Meter (Random Reads & Writes) Results


IO Meter (Sequential Reads & Writes) Results




Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

<<< The VelociRaptors, Performance Difference? : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Surface Temperature, Platter Data Transfer Profile >>>

The Samsung Galaxy S6 & Galaxy S6 Edge Unpacked Event Rev. 2.0
The Android Web Browser Round-Up
NVIDIA GeForce To Quadro Soft-Mod Guide Rev. 4.1
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Quad-Core Processor Review
OCZ 1GB Mini-Kart USB Flash Drive Review
The Rise And Distension Of The Instant Messenger
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX Graphics Card Review
Corsair XMS2-6400 TwinX Memory Kit Overview
Need For Speed : Underground 2 Game Review
Maxxing Out The GeForce Fx Go5200


Copyright © Tech All rights reserved.