Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 13 November 2008
 N/A
  N/A
 Storage
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 92969
 
   
The Tech ARP 2015 Mega Giveaway (Week 12)
This year, we are not only rewarding everyone who participates in the Tech ARP forums... Read here
Camera Shootout : The Samsung Galaxy S6 & Galaxy S6 Edge Vs. The Apple iPhone 6
In this comparison, we will compare the photos we took with the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy ... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
A Tale Of Two VelociRaptors
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Testing The VelociRaptors

The Testbed

Processors

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Motherboard

ASUS P5B-E Plus (Intel P965)

Memory

Two G.Skill 1GB PC2-6400 DDR2 modules
Two Kingston 512MB HyperX PC2-8500 DDR2 modules

Graphics Card

ASUS EN8800GTS 512MB

Hard Drives

300 GB Western Digital VelociRaptor BLFS
300 GB Western Digital VelociRaptor HLFS

Operating System

Microsoft Windows Vista 32-bit

 

Testing Methodology

We tested exclusively in Windows Vista, with the latest updates. We chose to use IO Meter as well as our "old faithful", WinBench 99 2.0, with the following tests :

  • Platter Data Transfer Profile
  • Business Disk WinMark 99
  • High-End Disk WinMark 99
  • Disk Transfer Rate (Beginning)
  • Disk Transfer Rate (End)

Business Disk WinMark 99 is a real-world simulation based on three office application suites - Microsoft Office 97, Lotus SmartSuite and Corel WordPerfect Suite 8, as well as a web browser, Netscape Navigator. They are quite dated, but should still reflect the usage patterns of users in an office environment using such applications. The test runs through a script that keeps multiple applications open, while it performs tasks that switches between those applications and Netscape Navigator. The result is the average transfer rate during the script run.

High-End Disk WinMark 99 is a real-world simulation based on AVS/Express 3.4, FrontPage 98, MicroStation SE, Photoshop 4.0, Premiere 4.2, Sound Forge 4.0 and Visual C++ 5.0. However, it differs by running the applications serially, instead of simultaneously. There are individual results for each application but in this comparison, we will be looking only at the weighted average score, which is the average transfer rate during the tests.

Unfortunately, WinBench 99 seemed to have some issues with Windows Vista, or the current Vista driver for the SATA controller. It would register a SetFilePointer error in the Disk Access Time test. So, we were not able to obtain any Disk Access Time results.

Page

Topic

1

The VelociRaptors
Performance Difference?

2

Testing The VelociRaptors

3

Surface Temperature
Platter Data Transfer Profile

4

Winbench 99 Results

5

IO Meter (Random Reads & Writes) Results

6

IO Meter (Sequential Reads & Writes) Results

7

Conclusion

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!



<<< The VelociRaptors, Performance Difference? : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Surface Temperature, Platter Data Transfer Profile >>>

 
   
OCZ RevoDrive 80 GB PCI Express Solid State Drive Review Rev. 2.0
Intel X25-M G2 (34 nm) 160 GB Solid State Drive Review
3D Gaming Advances In Microsoft Windows 7 Rev. 2.0
Samsung SGH-F330 Mobile Phone Overview
Galaxy GeForce 8600 GTS Graphics Card Review Rev. 2.0
Intel Developer Forum 2007 Report
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX Graphics Card Review Rev. 2.0
Windows Desktop Heap Tweak Guide
OCZ PC2-5400 Gold DDR2 Memory Overview
Arctic Silencer DIY Guide Rev. 2.0

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.