Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 15 October 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Technology Report
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 2.2
 Discuss here !
 199809
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 30.7
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - CPU/DRAM CLK Synch CTL
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Intel 45nm Core 2 Desktop Processor Pre-Launch Update Rev. 2.2
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Yorkfield Performance

Now, let's take a look at some performance Yorkfield and Wolfdale results from Intel. Let's start with the quad-core Yorkfield performance comparisons.

 

Yorkfield XE (12MB) vs. Kentsfield XE (8MB)

Intel pitted a pre-production 3.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (Yorkfield XE) against the current desktop performance leader, the 3.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (Kentsfield XE). The test was done on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard with 2 GB Corsair DDR3-1333 memory and an eVGA GeForce 8800 GTX on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit.

Since both processors were running at the same speed, the Yorkfield XE (QX9650) processor's larger 12 MB L2 cache allowed it to deliver a 5-10% increase in performance across the board. The large 60% boost in DivX 6.6 was mostly thanks to the implementation of SSE4-optimized code in DivX.

 

 

Yorkfield (12MB) vs. Kentsfield (8MB)

Next, Intel put a pre-production 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 (Yorkfield) against the 2.40 GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (Kentsfield). The test was done on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard with 2 GB Corsair DDR3-1333 memory and an eVGA GeForce 8800 GTX on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit.

Do note that the Yorkfield (Q9450) processor is running 260 MHz (10.8 %) faster than the Kentsfield (Q6600) processor in this test. With that said, the Yorkfield processor is about 13-23% faster than the Kentsfield.

If you extrapolate the data, then the Yorkfield processor is really about 12-21% faster than the Kentsfield at the same clock speed. This is almost entirely due to the 50% larger cache in the Yorkfield processor. The very large 81% boost in DivX 6.6.1 is again mostly due to SSE4-optimized code in DivX.



<<< The Roadmap, Processor Pricing : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Wolfdale Performance >>>

 

 
   
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Tech Report
Seagate 250 GB Momentus 5400.5 SATA Notebook Hard Disk Drive Review Rev. 1.1
Intel Core 2 Processor Performance Comparison Guide Rev. 2.7
Performance Improvements In Crysis 1.2
ASUS EN8800GTS 512MB Graphics Card Review
Samsung SGH-F500 Ultra Video Mobile Phone Review
Sony A810 Walkman Video MP3 Player
Security Boot Camp
Need For Speed : Underground 2 Game Review
Introduction To Serial ATA

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.