Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 15 October 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Technology Report
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 2.2
 Discuss here !
 193027
 
   
The Solid State Drive Optimization Guide Rev. 2.1
In this guide, we will show you how to maintain the performance and longevity of your... Read here
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 28.8
Covering 588 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Intel 45nm Core 2 Desktop Processor Pre-Launch Update Rev. 2.2
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Yorkfield Performance

Now, let's take a look at some performance Yorkfield and Wolfdale results from Intel. Let's start with the quad-core Yorkfield performance comparisons.

 

Yorkfield XE (12MB) vs. Kentsfield XE (8MB)

Intel pitted a pre-production 3.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (Yorkfield XE) against the current desktop performance leader, the 3.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (Kentsfield XE). The test was done on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard with 2 GB Corsair DDR3-1333 memory and an eVGA GeForce 8800 GTX on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit.

Since both processors were running at the same speed, the Yorkfield XE (QX9650) processor's larger 12 MB L2 cache allowed it to deliver a 5-10% increase in performance across the board. The large 60% boost in DivX 6.6 was mostly thanks to the implementation of SSE4-optimized code in DivX.

 

 

Yorkfield (12MB) vs. Kentsfield (8MB)

Next, Intel put a pre-production 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 (Yorkfield) against the 2.40 GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (Kentsfield). The test was done on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard with 2 GB Corsair DDR3-1333 memory and an eVGA GeForce 8800 GTX on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit.

Do note that the Yorkfield (Q9450) processor is running 260 MHz (10.8 %) faster than the Kentsfield (Q6600) processor in this test. With that said, the Yorkfield processor is about 13-23% faster than the Kentsfield.

If you extrapolate the data, then the Yorkfield processor is really about 12-21% faster than the Kentsfield at the same clock speed. This is almost entirely due to the 50% larger cache in the Yorkfield processor. The very large 81% boost in DivX 6.6.1 is again mostly due to SSE4-optimized code in DivX.



<<< The Roadmap, Processor Pricing : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Wolfdale Performance >>>

 

 
   
240 GB Intel 520 Series Solid State Drive Review
x264 HD Benchmark Ver. 5.0.1
Western Digital Scorpio Black (AFT) 750 GB Hard Disk Drive Review
Microsoft Windows 7 SSD Performance Comparison Rev. 2.1
Downgrade Rights For Windows 7 & Windows Vista Leaked! Rev. 2.0
PC Hardware Myths To Avoid In 2008
DigiDock AC-2220 FM Transmitter Review
OCZ PC4800 Platinum Elite Edition DDR Memory Review
Backpacking With A PDA
Definitive Review of the Zalman ZM50-HP GPU Cooler

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.