Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 15 October 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Technology Report
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 2.2
 Discuss here !
 201522
 
   
Hands On With The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X, R9 Fury X2 & R9 Nano
AMD not only set up a wide range of sample systems to demonstrate the performance of ... Read here
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 31.6
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Intel 45nm Core 2 Desktop Processor Pre-Launch Update Rev. 2.2
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Yorkfield Performance

Now, let's take a look at some performance Yorkfield and Wolfdale results from Intel. Let's start with the quad-core Yorkfield performance comparisons.

 

Yorkfield XE (12MB) vs. Kentsfield XE (8MB)

Intel pitted a pre-production 3.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (Yorkfield XE) against the current desktop performance leader, the 3.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (Kentsfield XE). The test was done on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard with 2 GB Corsair DDR3-1333 memory and an eVGA GeForce 8800 GTX on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit.

Since both processors were running at the same speed, the Yorkfield XE (QX9650) processor's larger 12 MB L2 cache allowed it to deliver a 5-10% increase in performance across the board. The large 60% boost in DivX 6.6 was mostly thanks to the implementation of SSE4-optimized code in DivX.

 

 

Yorkfield (12MB) vs. Kentsfield (8MB)

Next, Intel put a pre-production 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 (Yorkfield) against the 2.40 GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (Kentsfield). The test was done on an ASUS P5K3 Deluxe motherboard with 2 GB Corsair DDR3-1333 memory and an eVGA GeForce 8800 GTX on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit.

Do note that the Yorkfield (Q9450) processor is running 260 MHz (10.8 %) faster than the Kentsfield (Q6600) processor in this test. With that said, the Yorkfield processor is about 13-23% faster than the Kentsfield.

If you extrapolate the data, then the Yorkfield processor is really about 12-21% faster than the Kentsfield at the same clock speed. This is almost entirely due to the 50% larger cache in the Yorkfield processor. The very large 81% boost in DivX 6.6.1 is again mostly due to SSE4-optimized code in DivX.



<<< The Roadmap, Processor Pricing : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Wolfdale Performance >>>

 

 
   
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Gen. 2 USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review
Intel Future SSD Models Leaked! Rev. 2.0
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Tech Report
Intel Buys Over NVIDIA
Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Candidate Release Preview Details
Brando USB Chiller & Warmer Review
NVIDIA Buys Over AGEIA
Corsair 4GB Flash Voyager Review
Complete GeCube / GigaCube Radeon 9600 Pro/XT Voltage Modding Guide
MOSFET Heat Sink Guide

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.