Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 02 May 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Comparisons
 Adrian Wong
 2.0
 Discuss here !
 589297
 
   
BIOS Option Of The Week - ISA Shared Memory
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
Hard Disk Drive Myths Debunked Rev. 5.1
This guide was written in response to the numerous fallacies about the hard disk driv... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Compression Comparison Guide Rev. 2.0
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Aggregated Results

Compression Rate

Data Compressors
Total Size (bytes)
Compressed Size (bytes)
Space Saved (bytes)
WinRK
1,600,370,642
1,203,236,207
397,134,435
SBC Archiver
1,600,370,642
1,223,635,714
376,734,928
Squeez
1,600,370,642
1,245,264,843
355,105,799
StuffIt
1,600,370,642
1,294,493,195
305,877,447
WinRAR
1,600,370,642
1,294,753,625
305,617,017
WinZip
1,600,370,642
1,297,875,117
302,495,525
WinAce
1,600,370,642
1,298,332,334
302,038,308
7-Zip
1,600,370,642
1,299,895,231
300,475,411
bzip2
1,600,370,642
1,360,280,033
240,090,609
gzip
1,600,370,642
1,396,103,046
204,267,596
ARJ32
1,600,370,642
1,398,908,196
201,462,446

Overall, WinRK was the champion at compressing the filesets. It had an average compression rate of 24.8%. It was 5.5% better at overall compression than its closest rival, SBC Archiver which had an average compression rate of 23.5%.

The poorest compressors overall, at default settings, weregzip and ARJ32. They only had average compression rates of about 12.7%.

 

Compression Speed

Data Compressors
Total Size (bytes)
Time (s)
Speed (KB/s)
gzip
1,600,370,642
153.52
10424.5
ARJ32
1,600,370,642
178.37
8972.2
bzip2
1,600,370,642
428.51
3734.7
StuffIt
1,600,370,642
562.81
2843.5
WinZip
1,600,370,642
754.98
2119.8
7-Zip
1,600,370,642
895.61
1786.9
WinRAR
1,600,370,642
991.77
1613.7
SBC Archiver
1,600,370,642
1,086.19
1473.4
WinAce
1,600,370,642
1,383.81
1156.5
Squeez
1,600,370,642
1,509.54
1060.2
WinRK
1,600,370,642
9,378.82
170.6

However, gzip was the undisputed speed champion. It only took just over 2.5 minutes to completely process the complete fileset collection which weighed in at over 1.6GB. It was over 16% faster than the runner-up, ARJ32.

The other compressors were pretty slow at their maximum compression settings. However, WinRK was extremely slow. It took over 2.5 hours to compress the entire fileset collection.

 

Compression Efficiency

The compression efficiency rating is a simple way to evaluate the efficiency of each data compressor. This way, we can see which compressor can save the most space in the least time.

Please note that a higher efficiency rating does not mean the compressor is better. It just means the compressor has a better compression-to-speed ratio. A more efficient compressor is, of course, always more desirable than a less efficient one.

The most efficient data compressor for the aggregated results was gzip. Its super-fast compression speed, coupled with its average compression rate allowed it to become the undisputed overall efficiency champion. ARJ32 was close behind, and more than twice as efficient as its nearest rivals, bzip2 and StuffIt.

The other compressors were less efficient, but no one could beat WinRK. Although it was a really good compressor, its incredibly slow compression speed totally killed its efficiency ratings. Even WinAce was over 5X more efficient than it!



<<< Max: Pictures - JPEG (Poorly Compressible) : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Max: Conclusion >>>

 

 
   
Microsoft Office 14 Details Leaked! Rev. 1.1
An Inside Look Into The New Windows 7 Experience Index!
Intel Centrino Duo & Pro Technology Report
Jetart NC3000 Cool Stand Notebook Cooler Review
Seagate 160GB Momentus 5400.3 Hard Drive Review
BenQ E520 & E510 Digital Cameras
OCZ PC2-4200 Gold DDR2 Memory Overview
XTracPads HYBRID Mouse Pad Review
Chenming ATX-602 Aluminium Case Review Rev. 1.1
1GB Corsair PC3200 XLPRO Ultra-Low Latency TwinX Memory Kit Review

 
 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.