Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 
 02 May 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Comparisons
 Adrian Wong
 2.0
 Discuss here !
 530907
 
   
CPU Performance Comparison Guide Rev. 2.8
This article compiles the best benchmark results we collected of various CPU models u... Read here
Mobile GPU Comparison Guide Rev. 9.7
These days, there are so many mobile GPU models that it has become quite impossible t... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Compression Comparison Guide Rev. 2.0
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Conclusion

WinRK was the best compressor in most filesets it encountered. So, it was not surprising that it was the overall compression champion. However, its performance was offset by its abysmally slow performance. Even with a really fast system, it still took ages to compress the filesets. On several occasions, it took more than 18 minutes to compress just 200MB of files. Thanks to this flaw, it had the dubious honour of being the most inefficient compressor as well.

SBC Archiver, which was just slightly poorer than WinRK at compression was much faster at the job. Although it was nowhere near the top of the speed rankings, its faster speed allowed it to attain a moderate efficiency ranking.

WinRAR, which is a favourite of many Internet users, displayed a surprisingly bland performance at default settings. Although it had a pretty good overall compression rate of just under 19%, it was very slow at its default settings. That made it the third most-inefficient compressor. Surprising, isn't it?

In contrast, another perennial favourite, WinZip which had a lower overall compression rate of 13% managed to attain a much higher efficiency rating because it was able to compress the filesets much faster than WinRAR. Quite surprising since many users have abandoned it for WinRAR in view of its rather dated compression algorithm.

StuffIt is a dark horse. It has a pretty good compression rate overall but with an unimpressive compression speed. However, its amazing performance with JPEG files cannot be denied. JPEG files is undeniably StuffIt's forte. No other compressor even comes within a light year of it.

gzip and ARJ32 are both the fastest and the worst compressors of the lot. They have unimpressive overall compression rates but more than make up for it with their tremendous compression speeds. Therefore, it isn't surprising to see them garner the top two spots in compressor efficiency. However, we would still recommend GUI alternatives like WinZip. It is almost as efficient as gzip and ARJ32 and far more user-friendly.

Based on our results, we can only come to one conclusion. If you do not like to change the settings of your data compressors and want a good, fast and user-friendly data compressor, then WinZip is the best one for the job.

So there you have it - the results of the Normal Compression Test. Click here to go back to the test results index.

 

Questions & Comments

Please feel free to post your questions or comments here!

 

Date Revision Revision History
29-11-2002 1.0

Initial release.

15-04-2007 2.0 Part 1

Part 1 of the new compression comparison guide released.

23-04-2007 2.0 Part 2

Part 2 of the new compression comparison guide released.



<<< Normal: Aggregated Results : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Max: Audio Files - WAV (Highly Compressible) >>>

 

 
   
Western Digital AV-GP 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
Intel 80 GB X25-M (50 nm) Solid State Drive Review
The Intel Atom 2 Processor Tech Report
Samsung SGH-i450 Music Edition Mobile Phone Overview
Logitech MX510 Paint Mod Guide
Samsung @ World Cyber Games 2007
Gainward BLISS 7300 GT PCX Golden Sample Graphics Card Review
ASUS V6000V Notebook Overview
1GB Mushkin PC3200 222 LII V2 Dual Pack Memory Modules Review
Launch Of The Dothan

 
 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.